The Health Disparities Industry: Is It an Ethical Conundrum?

22Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reducing health disparities is the purported mission of a huge network of professionals representing many specialties and organizations offering a variety of products and services. Given its elaborate infrastructure and specialized set of activities, we identity the network as the health disparities industry. In this article, we question the ethics of this industry. Specifically, we ask whether the public mission is trumped by questionable industry leadership, ethics, and quality assurances. Drawing on general principles of ethics and differentiating ethical concerns from ethical problems, we conclude that the collective behaviors within the industry may represent an ethical conundrum. The article concludes with a call for the cross-examination of the industry practices. © 2010, Society for Public Health Education. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

An ethics framework for public health

688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

White norms and psychiatric diagnosis of black patients: Overview

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Black-white health disparities in the United States and Chicago: A 15-year progress analysis

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tackling racism as a “wicked” public health problem: Enabling allies in anti-racism praxis

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical care and health disparities

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community-Based Approaches to Prevention and Management of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shaw-Ridley, M., & Ridley, C. R. (2010). The Health Disparities Industry: Is It an Ethical Conundrum? Health Promotion Practice, 11(4), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839910375612

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

16%

Researcher 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 18

49%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

24%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

19%

Psychology 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free