A qualitative study of women's decisions not to have a hysterectomy

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In focusing on individual and physician demographics and system characteristics that lead to hysterectomy rate variations, researchers overlook the impact of culturally mediated meanings women assign to their bodies, hysterectomy, and other treatments. In this study I sought to provide a fuller description of this decision-making process by examining the role of meaning making in women's decision not to have a hysterectomy. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, nine women diagnosed with menstrual disorders in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada each took part in a semi-structured interview. Factors deemed "irrational" in biomedical understandings of informed choice played a significant role in participants' decisions not to have a hysterectomy. When these factors are hidden, they cannot be properly addressed during the treatment selection process. By shifting the approach to informed choice to incorporate a holistic view of the body and knowledge, requirements for informed choice may be more likely to be met. Keywords: Menstrual Disorders, Treatment Decision-Making, Women's Health, Descriptive Qualitative Research. © 2013: Erin Fredericks and Nova Southeastern University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fredericks, E. (2013). A qualitative study of women’s decisions not to have a hysterectomy. Qualitative Report, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1560

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free