The persistence of L1 patterns in SLA: The boundary crossing constraint and incidental learning

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on the theoretical framework of Talmy (1985 et passim) and Slobin (1987 et passim) the present study analyses the influence of L1 patterns on the description of motion events with boundary crossings. Arab speakers avoid the use of manner of motion verbs in the description of these events and use simple path verbs (e.g. enter, go etc.), whereas speakers of English mostly use manner verbs (run, crawl etc.). These deeply engrained differences between L1 and L2 are a learning challenge in SLA. We analyse the use of manner verbs by an intermediate and an advanced group of Arab EFL learners, who live in the UK. Most learners either avoid the description or use path verbs as in Arabic. As the learners do not produce ungrammatical sentences, they will not receive negative feedback (e.g. from a teacher) and rely entirely on incidental learning from the input. However, despite the high frequency of these manner verbs in the daily input of the learners, they do not acquire the patterns of the target language even at a high proficiency level. Implicit learning in this context is hardly possible and explicit teaching and learning is needed to overcome the influence of the first language.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alghamdi, A., Daller, M., & Milton, J. (2019, February 22). The persistence of L1 patterns in SLA: The boundary crossing constraint and incidental learning. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science. https://doi.org/10.35869/VIAL.V0I16.94

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free