Cardiovascular events associated with nicorandil administration prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Nicorandil may exert cardioprotective effects in ischemic heart disease. However, its efficacy in combination with early reperfusion is uncertain. The authors performed a meta-analysis of the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of nicorandil administration at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled studies. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), both in-hospital and post-discharge. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon. Results: Ten studies were included (n = 1105). Mean patient age was 63.0 ± 10.0 years; 76.6% of patients were male. Compared with controls who received primary PCI, combined nicorandil/primary PCI significantly reduced in-hospital MACE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–0.27), follow-up MACE (pooled OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.37–0.75), and total MACE (pooled OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.15–0.49). The combined treatment also reduced the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon (pooled OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.23–0.50). Conclusion: Nicorandil administration at the time of primary PCI is associated with reduced MACE (both short- and long-term) and no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Xu, X., Zhou, X., Dai, J., Ma, L., Chen, C., … Mao, W. (2019). Cardiovascular events associated with nicorandil administration prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 18(6), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2019.1617848

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free