A minimum-time obstacle-avoidance path planning algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicles

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we present a new strategy to determine an unmanned aerial vehicle trajectory that minimizes its flight time in presence of avoidance areas and obstacles. The method combines classical results from optimal control theory, i.e. the Euler-Lagrange Theorem and the Pontryagin Minimum Principle, with a continuation technique that dynamically adapts the solution curve to the presence of obstacles. We initially consider the two-dimensional path planning problem and then move to the three-dimensional one, and include numerical illustrations for both cases to show the efficiency of our approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges

685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Direct and indirect methods for trajectory optimization

588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to trajectory optimization: How to do your own direct collocation<sup>∗</sup>

426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A novel path planning method for multiple USVs to collect seabed-based data

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for UAV Path Planning Incorporating Vehicle Dynamics with Acceleration Control

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bvps codes for solving optimal control problems

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Marinis, A., Iavernaro, F., & Mazzia, F. (2022). A minimum-time obstacle-avoidance path planning algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicles. Numerical Algorithms, 89(4), 1639–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-021-01167-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

56%

Decision Sciences 2

22%

Chemical Engineering 1

11%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free