What Works to Improve Student Literacy Achievement? An Examination of Instructional Practices in a Balanced Literacy Approach

  • Bitter C
  • O'Day J
  • Gubbins P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A core assumption of the San Diego City Schools (SDCS) reform effort was that improved instructional practices, aligned with a balanced literacy approach, would be effective in improving student outcomes. This article explores this hypothesis by presenting findings from an analysis of classroom instruction data collected in 101 classrooms in 9 high-poverty elementary schools. Data were collected using a literacy observation tool adapted from prior research. The study found a prevalent focus on reading comprehension instruction and on students' active engagement in making meaning from text. Teachers' use of higher-level questions and discussion about text were substantially higher than that found by a prior study using the same instrument in similar classrooms elsewhere. Hierarchical Linear Modeling analyses of instruction and student outcome data indicate that teacher practices related to the higher-level meaning of text, writing instruction, and strategies for accountable talk were associated with growth in students' reading comprehension.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bitter, C., O’Day, J., Gubbins, P., & Socias, M. (2009). What Works to Improve Student Literacy Achievement? An Examination of Instructional Practices in a Balanced Literacy Approach. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 14(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660802715403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free