Reduced sensitivity from pooled urine, pharyngeal and rectal specimens when using a molecular assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea near the point of care

17Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of pooled self-collected urogenital, pharyngeal and anorectal specimens to that of individual specimen results for the molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) near the point of care (POC) for diagnostic sensitivity. Methods: Clients (mostly men who have sex with men) attending an urban community testing service and three sex-on-premises venues in Brisbane, Australia, were offered CT and NG testing by trained lay providers. Participants provided three self-collected specimens (urine, pharyngeal and rectal) for testing by GeneXpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). If any of the individual specimens from a participant were positive, all three specimens were pooled and retested. Results: Of the 388 participants who provided three individual anatomical specimens, 76 (19.6%) were found to be positive for CT and/or NG at one or more sites. The pooling approach failed to detect five CT rectal and four NG pharyngeal infections. The overall performance (sensitivity) of the pooling approach compared with individual specimen testing and Cohen's κ were 90.0% and 0.86 respectively for CT and 89.7% and 0.89 respectively for NG. Conclusions: Reduced sensitivity was observed when using pooled specimens for the detection of CT and NG using GeneXpert near the POC, similar to results reported in laboratory-based CT and NG pooling studies. These data suggest specimen pooling is feasible near to the POC, potentially saving time and costs when screening at-risk populations for CT and NG. Our data also suggest a reduction in pooled urine could improve overall test sensitivity.

References Powered by Scopus

Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting

1182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and infection among men who have sex with men-STD Surveillance Network, United States, 2010-2012

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hidden in plain sight: Chlamydial gastrointestinal infection and its relevance to persistence in human genital infection

156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chlamydia trachomatis as a Current Health Problem: Challenges and Opportunities

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Background review for the ‘2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults’

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Badman, S. G., Bell, S. F. E., Dean, J. A., Lemoire, J., Coffey, L., Debattista, J., … Whiley, D. M. (2020). Reduced sensitivity from pooled urine, pharyngeal and rectal specimens when using a molecular assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea near the point of care. Sexual Health, 17(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19028

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 5

36%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free