We may judge theories and discourse in early childhood and human capital by how useful they are for explaining practice and not how abstruse they are. Given expanding alignments of knowledge, technology, and critique, one grand counter narrative could not satisfy our needs (Lyotard, 1984). The aims of educational inquiry may be understood by developing frameworks of dimensionality recognizing hybrid or overlapping social theories. The palimpsest process of history shows how the paradigm shifts of theoretical legacies position us now to unpack our contemporary moment and to propose paths for future social practice.
CITATION STYLE
Zanoni, J. (2015). Theorizing Dialogue among Various Voices in Critical Theory. In Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood (Vol. Part F2172, pp. 27–43). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490865_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.