Because (of) is ambiguous between a 'reason' and a 'plain cause' interpretation. Presenting a semantic analysis within the framework of Discourse Representation Theory, I argue that because (of) always denotes a causal relation between causing facts and caused entites of various sorts and that its interpretational variance is dependent on the ontological nature of the caused entity. Finally, I point to a difference between sentential-complement because and nominal-complement because of with regard to their interaction with modals. Whereas both because and because of may outscope e.g. deontic necessity modals, only because may outscope epistemic modal operators. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
CITATION STYLE
Solstad, T. (2010). Some new observations on “because (of).” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6042 LNAI, pp. 436–445). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_44
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.