Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification

9Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Point ically twinedof unstable careconceptsultrasound patients, such as:(POCUS) however, “flow,” “congestion,”is there a first-line is confusion “fluidtool toresponsivenessassess surrounding hemodynam-(FR),” inter- and “fluid tolerance.” We argue that the Frank–Starling relationship is clarifying because it describes the interplay between “congestion” and “flow” on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Nevertheless, a single, simultaneous assessment of congestion and flow via POCUS remains a static approach. To expand this, we propose a two-step process. The first step is to place the patient on an ultrasonographic Diamond–Forrester plot. The second step is a dynamic assessment for FR (e.g., passive leg raise), which individualizes therapy across the arc of critical illness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kenny, J. É. S., Prager, R., Rola, P., Haycock, K., Basmaji, J., & Hernández, G. (2023, December 1). Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification. Critical Care Explorations. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free