Point ically twinedof unstable careconceptsultrasound patients, such as:(POCUS) however, “flow,” “congestion,”is there a first-line is confusion “fluidtool toresponsivenessassess surrounding hemodynam-(FR),” inter- and “fluid tolerance.” We argue that the Frank–Starling relationship is clarifying because it describes the interplay between “congestion” and “flow” on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Nevertheless, a single, simultaneous assessment of congestion and flow via POCUS remains a static approach. To expand this, we propose a two-step process. The first step is to place the patient on an ultrasonographic Diamond–Forrester plot. The second step is a dynamic assessment for FR (e.g., passive leg raise), which individualizes therapy across the arc of critical illness.
CITATION STYLE
Kenny, J. É. S., Prager, R., Rola, P., Haycock, K., Basmaji, J., & Hernández, G. (2023, December 1). Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification. Critical Care Explorations. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001022
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.