Framework for rapid comparison of extracellular vesicle isolation methods

66Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by all cells into biofluids and hold great promise as reservoirs of disease biomarkers. One of the main challenges in studying EVs is a lack of methods to quantify EVs that are sensitive enough and can differentiate EVs from similarly sized lipoproteins and protein aggregates. We demonstrate the use of ultrasensitive, single molecule array (Simoa) assays for the quantification of EVs using three widely expressed transmembrane proteins: The tetraspanins CD9, CD63, and CD81. Using Simoa to measure these three EV markers, as well as albumin to measure protein contamination, we were able to compare the relative efficiency and purity of several commonly used EV isolation methods in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): Ultracentrifugation, precipitation, and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). We further used these assays, all on one platform, to improve SEC isolation from plasma and CSF. Our results highlight the utility of quantifying EV proteins using Simoa and provide a rapid framework for comparing and improving EV isolation methods from biofluids.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ter-Ovanesyan, D., Norman, M., Lazarovits, R., Trieu, W., Lee, J. H., Church, G. M., & Walt, D. R. (2021). Framework for rapid comparison of extracellular vesicle isolation methods. ELife, 10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70725

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free