Skip to main content

"Prevention" and Human Gene Editing Governance

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Holocaust and the racial hygiene doctrine that helped rationalize it still overshadow contemporary debates about using gene editing for disease prevention. In part, this is because prevention can mean 3 different things, which are often conflated. Phenotypic prevention involves modifying the expression of pathogenic DNA variants to forestall their clinical effects in at-risk patients. Genotypic prevention involves controlling transmission of pathogenic variants between generations to avoid the birth of affected offspring. Preventive strengthening seeks to improve normal human traits to resist disease. These distinctions have been neglected in human gene editing governance discussions and are clarified in this article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Juengst, E. T. (2021). “Prevention” and Human Gene Editing Governance. AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(1), E49–E54. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free