Independence of events, and errors in understanding it

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article outlines errors that may occur when people predict event outcomes. The focus is on how our tendency to perceive independent events as connected, consistent with tenets of Gestalt Psychology, biases our expectations. Two well-documented phenomena that occur when people make predictions after a run of a particular outcome— the “gambler’s fallacy” and the “hot hand”—are used to illustrate the issue, and research is presented that highlights the importance of misperceptions of independence. Novel implications and hypotheses are presented that are generated from use of this gestalt approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness

2790Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Belief in the law of small numbers

1845Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences

949Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roney, C. (2016). Independence of events, and errors in understanding it. Palgrave Communications. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.50

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 2

50%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Sports and Recreations 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free