Comparison of cubesat and microsat catastrophic failures in function of radiation and debris impact risk

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Occurrence level comparison of catastrophic failures due to radiation effects on electronic components or collision with space debris are studied in two types of satellites: cubesats and microsats. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) case studies are proposed, and the level of catastrophic failure occurrence is quantified for the same mission duration. The variation in the occurrence of failures is studied and there is a determination of which is more likely. Emphasis is placed on examining how an increase in space debris would affect the reliability of future space missions.

References Powered by Scopus

A 1 cm space debris impact onto the Sentinel-1A solar array

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterization of the cataloged Fengyun-1C fragments and their long-term effect on the LEO environment

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heavy-ion induced single event effects and latent damages in SiC power MOSFETs

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tracking an untracked space debris after an inelastic collision using physics informed neural network

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Establishment and Application of an Elastic–Plastic Damage Constitutive Model for Ceramic Fiber Insulation Tiles

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Space Debris In-Orbit Detection with Commercial Automotive LiDAR Sensors

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lopez-Calle, I., & Franco, A. I. (2023). Comparison of cubesat and microsat catastrophic failures in function of radiation and debris impact risk. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27327-z

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

67%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Computer Science 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0