A comparative framework to evaluate recommender systems in technology enhanced learning: A case study

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When proposing a novel recommender system, one difficult part is its evaluation. Especially in Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL), this phase is critical because those systems influence students or educators in educational tasks. Our research aims to propose a framework for conducting comparative experiments of different recommender systems in a same educational context. The framework is expected to provide the accuracy of subject systems within a single experiment, depicting the benefits of a novel system against others. We also present an application of such framework for a comparative experiment of popular systems in TEL like Google, Slideshare, Youtube, MERLOT, Connexions and ARIADNE. Our results show that the proposed framework has been effective in comparing the accuracy of those systems, with a clear picture of their performance compared one another. Moreover, the results of the experiment can be used as a benchmark when evaluating novel recommender systems in TEL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lombardi, M., & Marani, A. (2015). A comparative framework to evaluate recommender systems in technology enhanced learning: A case study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9414, pp. 155–170). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27101-9_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free