Human Rights and the Challenges of Science and Technology: Commentary on Meier et al. “Translating the Human Right to Water and Sanitation into Public Policy Reform” and Hall et al. “The Human Right to Water: The Importance of Domestic and Productive Water Rights”

4Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The expansion of the corpus of international human rights to include the right to water and sanitation has implications both for the process of recognizing human rights and for future developments in the relationships between technology, engineering and human rights. Concerns with threats to human rights resulting from developments in science and technology were expressed in the early days of the United Nations (UN), along with the recognition of the ambitious human right of everyone “to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications.” This comment explores the hypothesis that the emerging concepts most likely to follow recognition of the human right to water primarily involve issues of science and technology, such as access to medicines or clean and healthy environment. Many threats to human rights from advances in science, which were identified in the past as potential, have become real today, such as invasion of privacy from electronic recording, deprivation of health and livelihood as a result of climate change, or control over individual autonomy through advances in genetics and neuroscience. This comment concludes by urging greater engagement of scientists and engineers, in partnership with human rights specialists, in translating normative pronouncements into defining policy and planning interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marks, S. P. (2014). Human Rights and the Challenges of Science and Technology: Commentary on Meier et al. “Translating the Human Right to Water and Sanitation into Public Policy Reform” and Hall et al. “The Human Right to Water: The Importance of Domestic and Productive Water Rights.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9518-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free