Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, and the Question Singular: What Marks the Difference between Humans and Animals?

  • Memon A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

What marks the difference between humans and ani-mals? At what point does a human become an animal and vice versa? What is the difference between human flesh and animal meat and reversibly, between human meat and animal flesh? Where is the line to be drawn between them, if possible? This paper seeks to problematize and rethink the long-established difference between humans and animals via Merleau-Ponty's notions of flesh and animality and Deleuze's notions of meat and the zone of indiscerniblility, as they are presented, respectively , in The Visible and the Invisible and in the second and third courses on nature in Nature: Course Notes from the College de France-"Animality, the Human Body, and the Passage to Culture" and "Nature and Logos: The Human Body"-and in the fourth chapter, "Body, Meat, and Spirit: Becoming-Animal," of the book, Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. In addition, Francis Bacon's paintings are used to illustrate the ambiguity and indiscerniblility between the human flesh and the animal meat. Suffice it to say, the clear-cut traditional distinction between a human animal and a non-human animal is called into question and is rethought through their corporeity rather than their intrinsic mental faculties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Memon, A. (2015). Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, and the Question Singular: What Marks the Difference between Humans and Animals? Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.17161/ajp.1808.9667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free