Efficacy of Alternate Nostril Breathing for Controlling Blood pressure, Anxiety and Heart rate among Egyptian Hypertensive Patients - An interventional one arm Study

  • Mohamed Mohamed Soliman H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The study examined the effect of Alternate Nostril Breathing exercise (ANB) on blood pressure, anxiety, and heart rate among Egyptian hypertensive patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental one group pretest and Post-test design was used. Conducted at outpatient's clinic in specialized medical hospital university of mansoura-Egypt. Sixty essential hypertensive patients were selected according to the study's' inclusion criteria. Intervention included continuous ANB exercise for four weeks, 2 times a day for 10 minutes in each therapy. The patient was assessed pre, on the 6 th day, and at the end of 4 weeks. Tools included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a mercurial sphygmomanometer, and a stethoscope were used to measure blood pressure and radial artery for measuring a pulse. Results: The data were analyzed using one ANOVA and Wilcoxon test. Showed that there was a significant decrease in blood pressure readings, heart rate, and anxiety level post the intervention, P < 0.0001 showed a marked significant change in pre-post-assessment on the 6 th day and at the end of 4 weeks. Conclusion: Overall, alternate nostril breathing exercise was effective in reducing hypertension, anxiety level, and heart rate. It's a safe, society accepted, easily performed, and does not require preparation or training. Recommendation: Alternate nostril breathing highly recommended for the nursing staff to incorporate it in the routine nursing care to all hypertensive patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohamed Mohamed Soliman, H. (2020). Efficacy of Alternate Nostril Breathing for Controlling Blood pressure, Anxiety and Heart rate among Egyptian Hypertensive Patients - An interventional one arm Study. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 11(2), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2020.166533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free