Better connected, more reputable? On the association between node centrality and academic reputation in the European Union research and innovation networks

9Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reputation is often overlooked in the geography of innovation studies, but may represent a relevant outcome of the participation in multi-scalar research and innovation networks. To date, a limited number of studies have outlined how collaborations in inter-organizational networks contribute to build academic reputation and scientific excellence, generally without distinguishing between the two concepts. This paper aims at assessing to what extent the degree of participation in the European Union nanotechnology network contributes to determine the reputation of universities as captured by renowned university rankings. Reputation is conceptualized as either the opinion of other academics about a given university (“academic reputation”) or scientific achievements (“scientific excellence”). The findings presented in this paper suggest that cooperation in international inter-organizational networks is not only essential for securing research funds and acquiring new relevant knowledge but also for positively contributing to shape academic reputation and enhance scientific excellence.

References Powered by Scopus

Emergence of scaling in random networks

29247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment

4442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation

3408Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Not all peripheries are the same: The importance of relative regional innovativeness in transnational innovation networks

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education: A Global Research Landscape of the Last Ten Years (2013–2022)

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning, policy instruments and networks in EU policy-making—Trends in European policy analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Calignano, G. (2021). Better connected, more reputable? On the association between node centrality and academic reputation in the European Union research and innovation networks. European Policy Analysis, 7(1), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1079

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Researcher 3

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 7

39%

Social Sciences 6

33%

Engineering 3

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free