Reassessment of the usefulness of frozen section analysis for hip and knee joint revisions

39Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Intraoperative frozen section (FS) consultation is used in evaluating possible infection in cases of hip and knee revision arthroplasty, serving as an adjunct to preoperative and intraoperative studies. We examined our experience for more than 11 years to determine if FS examination had value when sections were sent unselectively. We reviewed 244 cases, 132 with available culture results. The criterion for the presence of acute inflammation was more than 5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field (hpf) in at least 5 separate hpfs, excluding surface inflammatory exudate and fibrin. Only 27 cases (11.1%) demonstrated positive FS or paraffin section results. In comparison with intraoperative culture, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FS analysis alone (on review) were 29%, 95%, 40%, and 92%. As currently used, FS analysis has excellent specificity and negative predictive value but poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. We suggest that FS examination be used more selectively in conjunction with other studies, namely erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanner, W. A., Saleh, K. J., & Frierson, H. F. (2008). Reassessment of the usefulness of frozen section analysis for hip and knee joint revisions. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 130(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1309/YENJ9X317HDKEXMU

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free