The effect of different aging protocols on the flexural strength and phase transformations of two monolithic zirconia ceramics

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate how different aging protocols can affect the flexural strength and phase transformations of yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP) for monolithic restorations. Materials and methods: Bar-shaped specimens from two zirconia ceramics bars were divided into three groups: a. no treatment (c), b. aging in an autoclave (a), and c. thermal cycling (t). The flexural strength was determined by the 3-point bending test and statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences (p< 0.05). Weibull statistics was used to analyze the dispersion of strength values while surface microstructural analysis was performed through X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Aging did not significantly affect the flexural strength but differences were recorded between the two groups, with group A presenting higher strength values and m-phase percentages. Conclusions: The observed differences between the two ceramics could be attributed to variations in composition and processing.

References Powered by Scopus

2301Citations
1630Readers
Get full text
1729Citations
887Readers
Get full text

Phase Analysis in Zirconia Systems

1395Citations
333Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelesi, M., Kontonasaki, E., Kantiranis, N., Papadopoulou, L., Zorba, T., Paraskevopoulos, K. M., & Koidis, P. (2020). The effect of different aging protocols on the flexural strength and phase transformations of two monolithic zirconia ceramics. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800020982677

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

75%

Chemical Engineering 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0