Using multi-locus sequence data for addressing species boundaries in commonly accepted lichen-forming fungal species

25Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accurate species delimitations are of great importance for effectively characterizing biological diversity. Our criteria for delimiting species have changed dramatically over the last decades with the increasing availability of molecular data and improvement of analytical methods to evaluate these data. Whereas reciprocal monophyly is often seen as an indicator for the presence of distinct lineages, recently diverged species often fail to form monophyletic groups. At the same time, cryptic species have repeatedly been detected in numerous organismal groups. In this study, we addressed the species delimitation in the crustose lichen-forming fungal genus Diploschistes using multilocus sequence data from specimens representing 16 currently accepted species. Our results indicate the presence of previously undetected, cryptic species-level lineages in the subgenus Limborina. In the subgenus Limborina, samples from different continents currently classified under the same species were shown to be only distantly related. At the same time, in parts of subgen. Diploschistes characterized by short branches, none of the currently accepted species formed monophyletic groups. In spite of the lack of monophyly in phylogenetic reconstructions, a multispecies coalescent method provided support for eight of the nine accepted species in subgen. Diploschistes as distinct lineages. We propose to reduce D. neutrophilus to synonymy with D. diacapsis and point out that additional sampling will be necessary before accepting additional species in subgen. Limborina.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, X., Fernández-Brime, S., Wedin, M., Locke, M., Leavitt, S. D., & Lumbsch, H. T. (2017). Using multi-locus sequence data for addressing species boundaries in commonly accepted lichen-forming fungal species. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 17(2), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0320-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free