Long-Term Memory of Past Events in Great Apes

20Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It has been claimed that the ability to recall personal past events is uniquely human. We review recent evidence that great apes can remember specific events for long periods of time, spanning months and even years, and that such memories can be enhanced by distinctiveness (irrespective of reinforcement) and follow a forgetting curve similar to that in humans. Moreover, recall is enhanced when apes are presented with features that are diagnostic of the event, consistent with notions of encoding specificity and cue overload in human memory. These findings are also consistent with the involuntary retrieval of past events in humans, a mode of remembering that is thought to be less cognitively demanding than voluntary retrieval. Taken together, these findings reveal further similarities between the way humans and animals remember past events and open new avenues of research on long-term memory in nonhuman animals.

References Powered by Scopus

Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory

3256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays

1117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention

617Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the working memory of humans and great apes: Strikingly similar or remarkably different?

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mental time travel, language, and evolution

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distinct Patterns of Hippocampal and Neocortical Evolution in Primates

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, A., Berntsen, D., & Call, J. (2019). Long-Term Memory of Past Events in Great Apes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418812781

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

66%

Researcher 6

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 18

69%

Neuroscience 4

15%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Engineering 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 33

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0