Off pump coronary artery bypass

0Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is a technique of surgical coronary artery revascularization that is accomplished without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. The off pump technique is theoretically advantageous in that it avoids the cardiopulmonary bypass machine (often referred to as the “pump”), cardioplegia, and full aortic cross clamping. Large-scale studies have not shown a significant difference in mid-term OPCAB outcomes compared to on pump coronary artery bypass, but further large and long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the best surgical technique. Despite ongoing study, OPCAB is being used for selective indications and in centers with high surgical experience. In this chapter, we discuss historical perspectives of OPCAB, a comparison between on pump and off pump coronary artery bypass, and the surgical and anesthetic considerations of OPCAB. We conclude with a discussion of the potential complexities associated with the OPCAB technique.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year

372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) trial

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Downing, M. E., & Zaky, A. (2018). Off pump coronary artery bypass. In Everything You Need to Know: Out of the Operating Room and Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Procedures (pp. 289–302). Nova Science Publisher Inc. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14336-9

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Researcher 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

68%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

8%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0