Quality assessment for the putative intrinsic disorder in proteins

Abstract

Motivation: While putative intrinsic disorder is widely used, none of the predictors provides quality assessment (QA) scores. QA scores estimate the likelihood that predictions are correct at a residue level and have been applied in other bioinformatics areas. We recently reported that QA scores derived from putative disorder propensities perform relatively poorly for native disordered residues. Here we design and validate a general approach to construct QA predictors for disorder predictions. Results: The QUARTER (QUality Assessment for pRotein inTrinsic disordEr pRedictions) toolbox of methods accommodates a diverse set of ten disorder predictors. It builds upon several innovative design elements including use and scaling of selected physicochemical properties of the input sequence, post-processing of disorder propensity scores, and a feature selection that optimizes the predictive models to a specific disorder predictor. We empirically establish that each one of these elements contributes to the overall predictive performance of our tool and that QUARTER s outputs significantly outperform QA scores derived from the outputs generated the disorder predictors. The best performing QA scores for a single disorder predictor identify 13% of residues that are predicted with 98% precision. QA scores computed by combining results of the ten disorder predictors cover 40% of residues with 95% precision. Case studies are used to show how to interpret the QA scores. QA scores based on the high precision combined predictions are applied to analyze disorder in the human proteome.