Digital Portfolios in Action: Acknowledging Student Voice and Metacognitive Understanding in Art

  • Fahey P
  • Cronen L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students need a genuine voice in the content, process, outcome, and assessment of their learning so they can take ownership of their education (Jaquith and Hathaway 2012). Digital art portfolios allow students to research, document, and reflect on the development and assessment of their learning. Unlike traditional portfolios, which typically emphasize product, the use of digital portfolios as a process portfolio for learning has the potential to increase autonomy, experimentation, and allow the student to tell the story of their learning; to be metacognitive about their work (Berrett 2005). For the purposes of our research, we are defining metacognitive as awareness or analysis of one's own learning or thinking processes. The key elements of traditional paper portfolios include: collecting, selecting, reflecting, directing/goals, and presenting/celebrating. The use of technology adds to that list the processes of archiving, linking/thinking, storytelling, collaborating, sharing, and publishing (Barrett 2005). This paper examines how online digital portfolios provide a platform to promote students' metacognitive skills and direct their learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fahey, P., & Cronen, L. (2016). Digital Portfolios in Action: Acknowledging Student Voice and Metacognitive Understanding in Art. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(4–5), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1170450

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free