The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ascierto, P. A., Butterfield, L. H., Finn, O. J., Futreal, A., Hamid, O., LaVallee, T., … Hwu, P. (2022). The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021. Journal of Translational Medicine, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03384-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free