Trevo 6 × 25mm vs. 4 × 30mm in Mechanical Thrombectomy of M1 LVO

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Our primary objective was to determine the successful rate of recanalization of M1 large vessel occlusion using either the Trevo 4 × 30 mm or 6 × 25 mm stent during mechanical thrombectomy. Our secondary objectives were to determine differences between the use of these two stent retrievers regarding first-pass effect, periprocedural complications, and mortality in the first 90 days. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding the stent used, recanalization, number of passes, periprocedural complications, and mortality were determined via our mechanical thrombectomy database along with chart review. Conclusion: When comparing Trevo 4 × 30 mm to 6 × 25 mm stent retrievers used in mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery large-vessel occlusion causing stroke, there is no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization rates, first-pass effect, perioperative complications, or mortality at 90 days. Studies like this will hopefully lead to further prospective, randomized controlled trials that will help show experts in the field an additional way to perform this procedure effectively and safely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliver, M. J., Brereton, E., Khan, M. A., Davis, A., & Singer, J. (2021). Trevo 6 × 25mm vs. 4 × 30mm in Mechanical Thrombectomy of M1 LVO. Frontiers in Neurology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.677630

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free