Humanizing Science and Philosophy of Science: George Sarton, Contextualist Philosophies of Science, and the Indigenous/Science Project

Abstract

A century ago historian of science George Sarton argued that science is our greatest treasure, but it needs to be humanized or it will do more harm than good (1924). The systematic cultivation of an historical spirit, a philosophical appreciation of the dynamic nature of scientific inquiry, and a recognition that science is irreducibly a collective enterprise was, on Sarton's account, crucial to the humanizing mission he advocated. These elements of Sarton's program are more relevant than ever as philosophers of science articulate research programs that take seriously the contextual factors, situated interests, and historical contingencies that shape the sciences we study. I trace the trajectory of a long-term philosophical engagement with archaeology that illustrates a succession of ways in which social, cultural, and political values configure inquiry, culminating in a program of collaborative research that raises the question of what role philosophers can usefully play when the challenges of humanizing scientific practice have centrally to do with navigating entrenched asymmetries of power.