Prognostic and diagnostic validity of p16/Ki-67, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and HPV DNA in women with ASCUS: A follow-up study

13Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the prognostic and diagnostic ability of p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry, HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing and HPV DNA assay in triaging ASCUS to find a way to manage cervical lesions more effectively. Methods: We conducted a prospective study through follow-up. The detection methods of the three factors: p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry conducted by using the CINtec® Plus Kit, E6/E7 mRNA testing by QuantiVirus®HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay and DNA by Hybrid Capture 2 assay. Results: One hundred three women with ASCUS satisfied requirements and completed the entire follow-up process. All CIN2+ occurred in women who were mRNA positive at baseline, none in mRNA negative. 100% (6/6) patients with CIN2+ were HPV DNA assay positive, 100% (6/6) were HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing positive and 50.0% (3/6) were p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry positive. The risk ratio of E6/E7 mRNA test was 57.306 (95% CI 0.077-42,400.545). For endpoint of CIN2+, the sensitivity between HPV DNA assay and HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing is no statistical difference, but statistical difference exists between HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing vs. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry (χ 2 = 5.718, P = 0.023) and HPV DNA assay vs. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry (χ 2 = 5.718, P = 0.023). The specificity of E6/E7 mRNA testing, p16/Ki-67 and DNA assay in triaging ASCUS was 44.33, 75.26 and 11.34% respectively and is all statistical difference (χ 2 = 26.277, P < 0.001(HPV DNA assay vs. HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing), χ 2 = 19.297, P < 0.001(HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing vs. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry), χ 2 = 80.707, P < 0.001(HPV DNA assay vs. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry). The expression level of 2097.09 copies/ml was the optimal cut-off value for HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing to diagnose CIN2+, the sensitivity and specificity was 61.1 and 68.2%. Conclusions: High expression of HPV E6/E7 mRNA could be a good candidate as a diagnostic biomarker to triage ASCUS superseding HPV DNA. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry is suggested to be a good tool to triage ASCUS, but it reduced the sensitivity of diagnosis when improves the diagnostic specificity.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology

2838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer

899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Screening for cervical cancer us preventive services task force recommendation statement

806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Novel biomarkers with promising benefits for diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: a systematic review

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hiv-associated cancer biomarkers: A requirement for early diagnosis

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

REBACIN<sup>®</sup> inhibits E6/E7 oncogenes in clearance of human papillomavirus infection

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ren, C., Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Jiang, D. (2019). Prognostic and diagnostic validity of p16/Ki-67, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and HPV DNA in women with ASCUS: A follow-up study. Virology Journal, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1251-4

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

73%

Researcher 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

44%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

38%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0