Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little about how effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from other public communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interest groups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to have strong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibility assessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals by interest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument in multiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N = 4,659) establishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and realistic settings. An observational study (N = 700) shows that substantial portions of the public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment (N = 8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of party but not interest group communication.
CITATION STYLE
Jungherr, A., Wuttke, A., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2021). A Source Like Any Other? Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 276–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab005
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.