After Methods, Then What? A Researcher's Response to the Report of the National Research Council

  • Walker V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary commends the authors of Scientific Research in Education for addressing important questions for the field of education research and identifies six areas that might profit from further attention: 1) explicit factors that compromise the building of scholarly community, 2) introspective conversation on the role of the researcher in the research process, 3) privileged and silenced research, 4) over reliance on the scientific model as the most important way to influence policy, 5) integration of “stages” of research with research quality, and 6) innocence of purpose.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, V. S. (2005). After Methods, Then What? A Researcher’s Response to the Report of the National Research Council. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 107(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810510700105

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

89%

Linguistics 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free