Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy

49Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Diabetic retinopathy is a global leading cause of blindness. Patients increasingly use the internet to search for health-related information that may affect medical decision-making, but to date, no standard exists across published websites. Objective: To assess the quality, content, and readability of information found online for diabetic retinopathy. Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study analyzed 11 medical sites with information on diabetic retinopathy. Twenty-six questions were composed to include information most relevant to patients, and each website was independently evaluated by 1 vitreoretinal surgeon and 2 vitreoretinal fellows. Readability was analyzed using an online readability tool. The JAMA benchmarks were used to evaluate the quality of each site. Data were collected from December 2018 to January 2019 and analyzed in February 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: A 26-question survey, JAMA benchmarks, Flesch reading ease score, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman Liau Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. Results: The mean (SD) questionnaire score for all websites was 55.76 (13.38) (95% CI, 47.85-63.67) of 104 possible points. There was a difference between the content quality of the websites (H = 25.811, P =.004). The mean (SD) reading grade for all websites was 11.30 (1.79; 95% CI, 10.24-12.36). No correlation was found between content accuracy and the mean reading grade (r = 0.445, P =.17) or Google rank (r = -0.260, P =.43). No website achieved the full 4 JAMA benchmarks, and only 1 website achieved 3 of the 4 JAMA benchmarks. No correlation was found between the accuracy of the content of the website and JAMA benchmarks (r = 0.422, P =.20). The interobserver reproducibility was similar among the 3 observers (r = 0.87 between observers 1 and 2, r = 0.83 between observers 1 and 3, and r = 0.84 between observers 2 and 3, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kloosterboer, A., Yannuzzi, N. A., Patel, N. A., Kuriyan, A. E., & Sridhar, J. (2019). Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmology, 137(11), 1240–1245. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free