We’ve always been antagonistic: algorithmic resistances and dissidences beyond the Global North

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article we suggest that otherwise unacknowledged histories of technological antagonism can help us (artists, activists, and researchers) to more deeply appreciate the foundations on which we develop activist resistances to contemporary computing. Departing from the case of Brazil, our goal is to bridge historical and contemporary perspectives by: (1) discussing the everyday practises of technological dissidence in the country, and how appropriation has been used to resist unequal power structures; (2) presenting how particular tactical ruptures in the history of art and media activism have sought to contaminate and re-envision networked technologies; (3) exploring the particular notions of algorithmic antagonism that two contemporary projects (PretaLab/Olabi and Silo/Caipiratech) advance, and how they relate to their historical counterparts. In sum, these different threads remind us that we’ve always been antagonistic, and that recognizing a longer genealogy of technological dissidences and ruptures can strengthen current practises against algorithmic oppressions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, G., Moreschi, B., Mintz, A., & Beiguelman, G. (2022). We’ve always been antagonistic: algorithmic resistances and dissidences beyond the Global North. Media International Australia, 183(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221074792

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free