Trends and determinants of complementary feeding practices in Tanzania, 2004-2016

36Citations
Citations of this article
207Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Following the successful implementation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) strategy in Tanzania, improvements in child health indicators were observed. However, it remains unclear whether complementary feeding practices have improved given the renewed global agenda on child nutrition. This study investigated trends and socioeconomic and health service factors of complementary feeding practices in Tanzania for the period spanning from 2004 to2016. Methods: The study was based on the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey data for the years 2004-2005 (n = 2480), 2010 (n = 2275) and 2015-2016 (n = 2949) to estimate the trends in complementary feeding practices. Multivariate logistic regression models that adjusted for year of the survey, clustering and sampling weights were used to investigate the association between the modifiable study factors (socioeconomic and health service factors) and complementary feeding practices among children aged 6-23 months in Tanzania. Results: Over the study period, minimum dietary diversity (MDD) and minimum acceptable diet (MAD) have worsened from 46% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 41.5-50.7%) in 2004-2005 to 30% (95% CI 25.7-32.9%) in 2015-2016 and 16.9% (95% CI 14.9-18.9%) in 2004-2005 to 6.0% (95% CI 4.9-7.1%) in 2015-2016, respectively. Minimum meal frequency (MMF) remained unchanged, 37% in 2004-2005 and 2015-2016. The introduction of solid, semi-solid and soft foods improved from 79% (95% CI 74.5-83.9%) in 2004-2005 to 87% (95% CI 83.7-90.9%) in 2015-2016. Multivariate analyses revealed that higher maternal education and household wealth, mother's employment, health facility birthing and postnatal care (PNC) visit were associated with MDD, MAD and MMF. Traditional birth attendant-assisted births and PNC visits were associated with the introduction of complementary foods. In contrast, birthing in the health facility was associated with the delayed introduction of complementary foods. Conclusion: Between 2004 and 2016, the prevalence and determinants of complementary feeding practices varied in Tanzania. Improving complementary feeding practices is feasible in Tanzania given the renewed focus on child nutrition in the country. Child nutrition policy interventions should target all mothers, particularly mothers from low socioeconomic background and those with limited access to health services to maximise results.

References Powered by Scopus

Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences

4459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress

664Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic status, education and empowerment: Implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries

516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The influence of dietary diversity on the nutritional status of children between 6 and 23 months of age in Tanzania

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends and determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding in Ethiopia from 2000 to 2016

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determinants of trends in neonatal, post-neonatal, infant, child and under-five mortalities in Tanzania from 2004 to 2016

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ogbo, F. A., Ogeleka, P., & Awosemo, A. O. (2018). Trends and determinants of complementary feeding practices in Tanzania, 2004-2016. Tropical Medicine and Health, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-018-0121-x

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 65

68%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

13%

Researcher 11

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 48

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 31

30%

Social Sciences 16

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0