Arm anthropometry indices in Turkish children and adolescents: Changes over a three-year period

16Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Time-related changes and comparisons for mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), arm fat area (AFA) are lacking for Turkish children and adolescents. To determine the arm anthropometry indices (MUAC, TSF, AFA) in children and adolescents and to also assess the changes in these indices over a 3-year time period. Methods: The data of the Anthropometry of Turkish Children Aged 0-6 Years (ATCA-06) study and the Second Study of Determination of the Anthropometric Measurements of Turkish Children and Adolescents (DAMTCA-II) were used to calculate the arm anthropometry percentiles in a total group of 6982 children and adolescents aged 28 days to 17 years. The 3rd-97th percentiles were computed by the LMS method. Results: In girls, 50th percentile MUAC values linearly increased with age. In boys, 50th percentile TSF values linearly increased until 10 years of age and decreased after age 11 years, while in girls, TSF values increased linearly with age. 50th percentile values for AFA showed a linear increase in both genders with age. Significant differences were found between the 5th, 50th and 95th percentile values for MUAC and AFA obtained in the two studies (DAMTCA-II and DAMTCA-I) in both boys and girls. Conclusions: The prominent finding was the significant and alarming increase in arm anthropometry indices in both genders within as short period of time as three years.

Figures

  • Figure 1a. Comparison of arm fat area (AFA) 5th-50th-95th percentiles of Determination of the Anthropometric Measurements of Turkish Children and Adolescents (DAMTCA-I) and DAMTCA-II studies for boys
  • Figure 1b. Comparison of arm fat area (AFA) 5th-50th-95th percentiles of Determination of the Anthropometric Measurements of Turkish Children and Adolescents (DAMTCA-I) and DAMTCA-II studies for girls
  • Table 1a. Sample size and mean ± SD values per age group for six anthropometric indices (boys)
  • Figure 2a. Comparison of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) 5th-50th-95th percentiles of Determination of the Anthropometric Measurements of Turkish Children and Adolescents (DAMTCA-I) and DAMTCA-II studies for boys
  • Figure 2b. Comparison of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) 5th-50th-95th percentiles of Determination of the Anthropometric Measurements of Turkish Children and Adolescents (DAMTCA-I) and DAMTCA-II studies for girls
  • Table 1b. Sample size and mean ± SD values per age group for six anthropometric indices (girls)

References Powered by Scopus

Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihood

2266Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status

1430Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overweight schoolchildren in New York State: Prevalence and characteristics

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A growth reference for mid upper arm circumference for age among school age children and adolescents, and validation for mortality: Growth curve construction and longitudinal cohort study

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of nutritional status in children with cancer: Significance of arm anthropometry and serum visceral proteins

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of upper arm anthropometry, upper arm muscle area-by-height (UAMAH) and midupper- arm-circumference (MUAC)-for-height as indicators of body composition and nutritional status among children

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çiçek, B., Öztürk, A., Mazıcıoğlu, M. M., & Kurtoğlu, S. (2014). Arm anthropometry indices in Turkish children and adolescents: Changes over a three-year period. JCRPE Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, 6(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.1574

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

70%

Social Sciences 2

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0