Ethical hazards and safeguards in penetration testing

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Penetration testing entails attacking a system to identify and report insecurity, but doing so without harming the system nor encroaching on the dignity of those affected by it. To improve the interaction between penetration testers and their processes and technology, we need to understand the factors that affect decisions they make with ethical import. This paper presents four ethical hazards faced by penetration testers, and three safeguards that address them. We also present preliminary results validating the hazards and safeguards.

References Powered by Scopus

Designing information systems in social context: A goal and scenario modelling approach

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethical Hazards: A Motive, Means, and Opportunity Approach to Curbing Corporate Unethical Behavior

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Designing usable and secure software with IRIS and CAIRIS

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faily, S., Iacob, C., & Field, S. (2016). Ethical hazards and safeguards in penetration testing. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2016 (Vol. 2016-July). BCS Learning and Development Ltd. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2016.83

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free