Corneal confocal microscopy: A useful tool for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy in type 2 diabetes

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) for small fiber neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: There were 186 participants with type 2 diabetes enrolled in this cross-sectional research. Pure small fiber neuropathy and mixed fiber neuropathy were defined using clinical examination, electromyography, and quantitative sensory testing. Demographics and clinical data, corneal confocal microscopy parameters, and other neuropathy measures were compared among the groups. The diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy for small fiber neuropathy was assessed by the receiver operating curve. Results: Of the 186 patients, 24.7% had a pure small fiber neuropathy and 17.2% of patients were diagnosed with mixed fiber neuropathy. The corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) were significantly lower in subjects with pure small fiber neuropathy compared with those without diabetic peripheral neuropathy (all P < 0.05). The receiver operating curve analysis for corneal confocal microscopy diagnosing small fiber neuropathy demonstrated the area under the curve for CNFD of 0.791, CNFL of 0.778, CNBD of 0.710. Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes with pure small fiber neuropathy showed more corneal nerve loss compared with those without diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It was revealed that corneal confocal microscopy can be a reasonable marker in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy in type 2 diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jin, Y., Wang, W., Chen, W., Guo, S., Li, C., Zhu, D., & Bi, Y. (2021). Corneal confocal microscopy: A useful tool for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 12(12), 2183–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free