Unprovokedattacksbysharksonhumansareexceptionallyrarephenomena.Sharkstypicallyhavetwomotivations, feedingordefense,thatresultinattacksonhumans.Threespecies,thebull,tiger,andwhitesharks,areresponsibleforthemajority ofattacksonhumans.Thesepredominantlyfeeding-motivatedattacksareoftentheresultofthesharkmistakingitshumanvictim fornaturalprey. Many species,however,exhibitadefensive,aggressivedisplay that,unheeded,may result inasinglebiteor slashingwoundtoahuman.Thenumberofunprovokedattacksbysharksonhumansworldwidehasrisenfrom8during1900- 1904,ofwhich2werefatal,to330during2000-2004,ofwhich29werefatal.Theratesof5.8fatalitiesperyearduring2000-2004 and6.4fatalitiesperyearduring1995-1999arenegligiblerelativetotheaverageof42,593fatalitiesperyearduetoautomobile accidentsreportedfrom1993-1995intheUnitedStatesalone.Takingalookatsharksfromanotherperspective,ecotourismhas becomeimmenselypopularinthe1990sand2000s.Thereareopportunitiestoviewsharksinthewildoneverycontinentexcept Antarctica, with the scalloped hammerhead, white, whale, and reef sharks being among the most popular subjects. Shark ecotourismisprovidingthepublicwithanobservationalexperiencethatcanbeaspleasurableaswhalewatching,anditcanbea cost-effectivealternativesourceofemploymentforfishermen.Thiscouldleadtoreducedsharkfishingincertainregionsofthe worldandenablesharkpopulationstorecovertotheirformerlevelsofabundance.
CITATION STYLE
Klimley, A., Peter, & Curtis, T., H. (2006). Shark Attack versus Ecotourism: Negative and Positive Interactions. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 22. https://doi.org/10.5070/v422110162
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.