A quantitative approach using goal-oriented requirements engineering methodology and analytic hierarchy process in selecting the best alternative

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Decision making in Software Engineering plays an important role at different stages of Software development life cycle. In this paper we consider the case study of selecting one among the three Content Management Systems (CMS) for a university website. We use our Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) method to identify the soft goals which play a vital role in deciding which CMS is chosen. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then used to prioritize the soft goals. The output of GORE and AHP are combined in order to produce a metric which decides the best alternative among the candidates. © 2013 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vinay, S., Aithal, S., & Sudhakara, G. (2013). A quantitative approach using goal-oriented requirements engineering methodology and analytic hierarchy process in selecting the best alternative. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 174 AISC, pp. 441–454). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0740-5_54

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free