International Business Cycles: Theory vs. Evidence

  • Kehoe P
  • Backus D
  • Kydland F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents the neoclassical model of capital accumulation augmented by choice of labor supply as the basic framework of modern real business cycle analysis. Preferences and production possibilities are restricted so that the economy displays steady state growth. Then we explore the implications of the basic model for perfect foresight capital accumulation and for economic fluctuations initiated by impulses to technology. We argue that the neoclassical approach holds considerable promise for enhancing our understanding of fluctuations. Nevertheless, the basic model does have some important shortcomings. In particular, substantial persistence in technology shocks is required if the model economy is to exhibit periods of economic activity that persistently deviate from a deterministic trend.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kehoe, P. J., Backus, D. K., & Kydland, F. (1993). International Business Cycles: Theory vs. Evidence. Quarterly Review, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.21034/qr.1742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free