Assessment centres for core medical training: How do the assessors feel this compares with the traditional interview?

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2007, an assessment centre approach (a structured interview, a case-based discussion and a communication exercise) was implemented to replace the traditional interview for entry to core medical training. Feedback was obtained from 53 of 69 assessors, all consultants and most with extensive experience of the traditional system. Each station was rated by around 20 interviewers. This overwhelmingly rated the new process as useful in assessing the candidate (>90% for all stations). Comparison with the previous system was only provided by between 12 and 21 people per station. The structured interview was rated better (n=12), undecided (8), or worse (1); the case-based discussion better (16), or undecided (3); the communication station better (8), undecided (3), or worse (1). There is still work to do on the best components to include but the principle of multiple assessments to examine differing parts of the person specification seems, subjectively, to be supported. © Royal College of Physicians, 2009. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchison, H. (2009). Assessment centres for core medical training: How do the assessors feel this compares with the traditional interview? Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 9(2), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-2-147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free