Gender heterophily and equality: a contribution to gender equality in the Chilean scientific sector

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Women’s insertion or consolidation in science has been thoroughly researched. Such discussion could be particularly relevant concerning sustainable development goal five (SDG 5) on Gender Equality advancement. However, the debate is focused on women percentages inserted into scientific labor, leaving the issue of symbolic experience for women in research unaddressed and with little empirical support. The data come from a survey developed under a FONDECYT project, which studied knowledge production in Chile. Researchers obtained contacts through invitations on social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn and databases containing scientists’ emails working in Chile. The non-probabilistic sample collected 583 cases, with participants residing in 15 of the 16 country regions. As a result, this document presents the findings of a study on symbolic experience using an instrument to determine whether there are any homophily patterns. It aims to determine if scientists tend to cite others as referents only when they encounter a situation like their own. The findings reveal a clear way scientists estimate the effect of others in terms of their gender homophily. This intervening factor could be crucial in reproducing the disparities and asymmetries that characterize Chile’s scientific field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Espinosa-Cristia, J. F., Vega-Muñoz, A., Cerda-Suarez, L. M., & Leyton-Johns, L. (2023). Gender heterophily and equality: a contribution to gender equality in the Chilean scientific sector. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free