Ultrasound-, CT- and MR-Guided Robot-Assisted Interventions

  • Baert A
  • Knauth M
  • Sartor K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The economic advantages and increased precision persistently demonstrated by industrial robots have stimulated the application of robots in the medical arena (Fichtinger et al. 2001; Cleary and Nguyen 2001; Nathoo et al. 2005). The main advantages of medical robotic systems include accurate needle guidance and stable access, leading to increased precision, accuracy and reproducible sampling of different parts of a lesion. Robotic-assisted procedures also involve the insertion of tubular therapy devices (ablation probes, catheters, bone drills, screws, tissue ablating devices, etc.) into the body, with the guidance of intra-operative imaging devices, such as CT, MRI, ultrasound or fluoroscopy (Cleary and Nguyen 2001; Cleary et al. 2006; Davies 2000; Fichtinger et al. 2001; Howe and Matsuoka 1999; Pott et al. 2005). The potential advantages are well known in the technical community (Fichtinger et al. 2001) and a variety of medical robots have been developed in recent years, including robotics for rehabilitation, or miniature robots that might be placed inside the body (Fichtinger et al. 2001; Kassim et al. 2005; Masamune et al. 2001; Nathoo et al. 2001; Satava 2003; Yanof et al. 2001).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baert, A. L., Knauth, M., Sartor, K., Neri, E., Caramella, D., Bartolozzi, C., … Cleary, K. (2008). Ultrasound-, CT- and MR-Guided Robot-Assisted Interventions. In E. Neri, D. Caramella, & C. Bartolozzi (Eds.), Image Processing in Radiology (pp. 393-409–409). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free