Merging Roles in Coordination and in Agent Deliberation

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we generalize and merge two models of roles used in multiagent systems which address complementary aspects: enacting roles and communication among roles in an organization or institution. We do this by proposing a metamodel of roles and specializing the metamodel to two existing models. We show how the two approaches can be integrated since they deal with complementary aspects: Boella [1] focuses on roles as a way to specify interactions among agents, and, thus, it emphasizes the public character of roles. [2] focuses instead on how roles are played, and thus it emphasizes the private aspects of roles: how the beliefs and goals of the roles become the beliefs and goals of the agents. The former approach focuses on the dynamics of roles in function of the communication process. The latter focuses on agents internal dynamics when they start playing a role or shift the role they are currently playing. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boella, G., Genovese, V., Grenna, R., & Van Der Torre, L. (2009). Merging Roles in Coordination and in Agent Deliberation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5044 LNAI, pp. 62–73). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free