Indicators of social background belong to the standard set of instruments for empirical research in education. Construction of valid ranking scales and category systems for social background depends on a differentiated surveying of the occupation and vocational activity of parents. Coding such details using standard procedures is a complex process. This contribution investigates the intercoder-reliability of occupational codes according to ISCO-88 and the indicators for socio-economic status (ISEI) based on these codes using a random sample of 300 graduates surveyed on the occupation of their father and mother. To this aim, we compared a double-coding by professional coders and a double-coding by the research team. The results show a match of around 50 percent between the two coding groups. The validity of the index of socio-economic status based on the data was, however, very good. The correlation between ISEI-values based on the coding from the different coders was very high. The predication of family background did not vary between the coding of the different coding groups. © VS-Verlag 2009.
CITATION STYLE
Maaz, K., Trautwein, U., Gresch, C., Lüdtke, O., & Watermann, R. (2009). Intercoder-reliabilität bei der berufscodierung nach der ISCO-88 und validität des sozioökonomischen status. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 12(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-009-0068-0
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.