Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs

44Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Numerous human task-switching studies have shown that decision making that follows a task switch is slower and less accurate than that which follows a task repetition. Stoet and Snyder (2003a) tested humans and rhesus monkeys on a task-switching paradigm, but found, surprisingly, no switch costs in the monkeys. We hypothesized that the exceptional monkey behavior may have been due to the more extensive practice the monkeys received in comparison with human subjects. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that extensive practice can abolish switch costs in humans. Four human subjects each performed 23,000 trials in a task-switching paradigm. We found that this amount of practice does not abolish switch costs. Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2007). Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.3.192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free