An approach to holistic development of serious games and learning simulations

0Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This discourse is an argument for a holistic approach to developing learning games and computer mediated experiences through the intersections of the areas of efficacy, effectiveness, and user experience in designing and developing serious games and simulated learning experiences. Some examples are explored in which reasonably effective design approaches could have been improved by a more holistic and iterative approach. The approach includes the integration of learning objectives, outcomes, usability, motivation, experience, ludus, aesthetics, cost and sustainability of the systems based on research within the fields of education, learning theory, game design theory, and simulation. These constructs explain the need for an iterative and holistic approach to designing and developing learning games. Embracing iterative and learning centered design of serious games will perpetuate development of effective educational technology. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.

References Powered by Scopus

Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning

1086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics: Second Edition

837Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Purposeful by design?: A serious game design assessment framework

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayes, A. T. (2014). An approach to holistic development of serious games and learning simulations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8524 LNCS, pp. 42–49). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

14%

Researcher 2

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

63%

Engineering 3

16%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Arts and Humanities 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free