Theoretical Principles of Multiscale Spatiotemporal Control of Neuronal Networks: A Complex Systems Perspective

3Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Success in the fine control of the nervous system depends on a deeper understanding of how neural circuits control behavior. There is, however, a wide gap between the components of neural circuits and behavior. We advance the idea that a suitable approach for narrowing this gap has to be based on a multiscale information-theoretic description of the system. We evaluate the possibility that brain-wide complex neural computations can be dissected into a hierarchy of computational motifs that rely on smaller circuit modules interacting at multiple scales. In doing so, we draw attention to the importance of formalizing the goals of stimulation in terms of neural computations so that the possible implementations are matched in scale to the underlying circuit modules.

References Powered by Scopus

Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.

13709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Controlling chaos

6059Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chronic parkinsonism in humans due to a product of meperidine-analog synthesis

4197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Does the brain behave like a (complex) network? I. Dynamics

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A computational perspective of the role of the thalamus in cognition

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multilevel Mesoscale Complexities in Mesoregimes: Challenges in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dehghani, N. (2018). Theoretical Principles of Multiscale Spatiotemporal Control of Neuronal Networks: A Complex Systems Perspective. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00081

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

48%

Researcher 9

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 14

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

25%

Engineering 6

21%

Computer Science 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 13

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0