An analysis of eye-movements during reading for the detection of mild cognitive impairment

33Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a machine learning analysis of eye-tracking data for the detection of mild cognitive impairment, a decline in cognitive abilities that is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. We compare two experimental configurations (reading aloud versus reading silently), as well as two methods of combining information from the two trials (concatenation and merging). Additionally, we annotate the words being read with information about their frequency and syntactic category, and use these annotations to generate new features. Ultimately, we are able to distinguish between participants with and without cognitive impairment with up to 86% accuracy.

References Powered by Scopus

Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research

5935Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis

3853Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud

3202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease based on spontaneous speech using ASR and linguistic features

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases: A review of available tools with a focus on machine learning techniques

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting MCI status from multimodal language data using cascaded classifiers

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fraser, K. C., Fors, K. L., Kokkinakis, D., & Nordlund, A. (2017). An analysis of eye-movements during reading for the detection of mild cognitive impairment. In EMNLP 2017 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings (pp. 1016–1026). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1107

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

59%

Researcher 16

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 39

70%

Linguistics 8

14%

Engineering 5

9%

Neuroscience 4

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0